Ontological theory and torture

This is a simplification that reduced the validity of my argument. Reflection, by contrast, has been excluded by the empirical method of traditional science. OST scholars aim at explaining the seemingly irrational behavior of states. As a result, the government changed its policy on torture to permit the use of torture during interrogation of suspected criminal terrorists.

States are thus not only interested in survival as realists assert but also in the continuation of the self, i. In my case, the theory was able to shed light on the motivation of norm-violating state behavior. In this context, work has been done on the case of Israel Bar-Tal That is to assume that substances, as substances, are self-subsistent entities.

In some cases, what is new is just recognizing the necessity of what is already believed to be true, but in other cases, the beliefs themselves Ontological theory and torture new. That is protecting the Americans and the country from terrorist attacks. Deontologists prohibit torture under all situations.

A Sociology of Violence and Human Rights. Thus, realism leads by way of some problematic ontological dualism to anti-realism, or skepticism about the reality of what is supposed to be demonstrated, and the failure of epistemological philosophy in inevitable.

States become attached to established roles and routines because they sustain self-identity and thus provide ontological security.

Also, they should prove that the threat is sufficiently harmful in order to justify torture. Therefore, law enforcement officers can use torture to protect citizens though it violates the enemy combatant rights and causes pain. Various laws have been developed to prohibit torture as it is immoral in the American free society.

Ontological explanations show how basic substances are identical to what is found in the world. We can give a rough statement of the principle like this: Conclusion While much work remains to be done on concepts and definitions, ontological security theory is a promising tool for scholars to understand world politics.

Premise 1 is just the PRP, which has already been discussed.

It is a better ontological explanation of the world than any alternative currently considered by naturalists. Later, when we take up necessary truths about evolution, we will trace that disposition to the function of the brain and how the brain works.

Furthermore, since spatiomaterialism can explain the truth of all the other basic laws of physics, science offers no reason to doubt that it is true.

Empirical ontology affords, therefore, a way of doing philosophy that is not currently being considered.

Organizational processes and ontological (in)security: Torture, the CIA and the United States

International Relations 22 2: The Einsteinian overthrow of the Newtonian belief in absolute space and time has led naturalists to assume that space cannot be a substance enduring through time.

It does what philosophy has always aspired to do. That is spatiomaterialism, and combined with the truth of the laws of physics, it entails the ontological necessary truths by which all the theories in less general branches of science are reduced to a simple ontological theory. While individuals can easily think of several routines that they follow in their daily lives, it is more difficult to identify the routines of a state.

Foreign policy included proactive foreign aggression and policies from the toolbox of a realist. Moreover, the torturer should be able to differentiate truthful and false information by observing the criminal.

Ontological Security – what’s behind this new theory trending in IR?

That is, the recognition that ontology is a more basic branch of empirical science than physics introduces the project of discovering the simplest and fewest kinds of basic substances that can explain the truth of the laws of physics.First there is the Anti-Torture Argument, which aims to establish that we have a reason to avoid torturing babies, then there is the argument for realism itself, which aims to establish from the Anti-Torture Argument that moral realism (as understood for the purposes of this thread) is true.

The theory shed light on the meaning of 9/11 for the American people and the specific psychological reactions at work that favored the use of torture on detainees.

9/11 challenged not only American physical security but also, and maybe more so, American ontological security, i.e. the confidence that the American self will prevail in the world. The Logic of Torture Keith Burgess-Jackson The Wall Street Journal Wednesday, December 5, Why the subject of torture provokes so much yelling and so little argumentation.

Ontological philosophy is the "metaphysical realism," the "One True Theory," and the "God's Eye View" of the world whose possibility is denied by such so-called internal realists.


Ontological Theory And Torture  Torture and Ethics Esstene’ West AJS/ December 10, Eric Yuva Torture and Ethics According to Steven Biko, “the most potent weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.” This is very true when it.

The Ontological Foundations for Natural Law Theory and Contemporary Ethical Naturalism Bernard Mauser Marquette University Recommended Citation Mauser, Bernard, "The Ontological Foundations for Natural Law Theory and Contemporary Ethical Naturalism" ().

Ontological theory and torture
Rated 3/5 based on 43 review