Perhaps the most interesting of these is the discussion of Madison. Instead, artisans and mechanics took to heart the rhetoric of equality and elected men of the middling ranks who promised to champion local interests.
Relations with Great Britain after the American Revolution. The patriot leaders envisioned the new American republic as a nation of freeholders governed by gentlemen of disinterested virtue whose leisure and independence from petty commercial concerns elevated them above the corruptions of self interest.
These essays are neatly sandwiched between an introduction and an epilogue which the author uses to tie his central thesis together. Wood goes to great lengths to explain how Madison was actually consistent throughout. Franklin did not live to see it.
October 13, Summary: Yet, with the winning of the Pulitzer Prize in for The Radicalism of the American Revolution and his subsequent works, Wood became and has remained a favorite of the well-educated general reader. He is an excellent writer who draws from a vast, personal storehouse of facts, quotations, ideas, and histories.
I am also a lifelong supporter of the Pittsburgh Steelers. Even before he was elected president, he zealously guarded his reputation.
The only point I would add is this: XXX, September,p. The Pantheon-level Founders, he tells us, neither expected nor hoped for the rambunctious democracy that emerged in the nineteenth century. History survey as well as upper-level courses primarily in Early American History. In I completed a Ph.
This thesis is that the Founders were a unique elite and unwittingly designed a system that ultimately ensured that their like would be unlikely to arise again. Actually, he does rather more than that; for a slim summary of a big event there is a great deal of synthesised analysis wound around his narrative.
The republicanism that the colonists embraced during the Revolution dissolved the old monarchical connections of hierarchy, patronage, and dependency; in this sense it was as radical for the eighteenth century as Marxism would be for the nineteenth.
Wood closes his essay on Washington by reiterating his thesis that the representative democracy that Washington helped usher into existence made such great heroes no longer essential to the working of the American government.
Standards of living were going up as cross-Atlantic trade flourished and settlements developed their own manufacturing, undermining the old paternalistic structure of colonial society.
Phil Hamilton on Aug 3, at Rather he offers an argument about how people of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries thought. As befitting a book entitled Revolutionary Characters, Wood starts off with an essay on George Washington.
As a result, America became the first modern society to bring ordinary people into government as rulers as well as voters—a bloodless transition to democracy that the Founding Fathers had neither anticipated nor desired. Anonymous on Jul 30, at 6: Instead he was unabashedly grasping, and ambitious.
Respect and entitlement to public office was no longer reserved for this generation of self-made aristocratic intellectuals.
Even Jefferson, patron-saint of 20th-century democracy, died disillusioned by the rising Jacksonianism of the s. Joyfully for those of us who find it hard to get our historical kicks from ferreting on the battlefields, he devotes few pages to the eight years of actual fighting.
Nothing but the critical situation of his country would have induced him to so hazardous a conduct.
The small depended on the great and such personal relationships constituted the ligaments that held society together. He begins his tale by explaining the factors that, in the 15 years running up to the Declaration of Independence inwere aggravating relations between the British and their increasingly suspicious colonists.
Sources for Further Study American Spectator.Title: The Radicalism of the American Revolution. Author: Gordon Wood. a kind of sorcerer's apprentice quality with runaway democracy instead of brooms.
Wood's depiction is controversial, as he spends worryingly little time discussing anyone other than white men (slavery is barely touched upon, despite an entire third of the book titled. Jul 24, · Eleven essays encompass the entire career of the historian Gordon S. Wood, whose work re-envisioned the American Revolution and, unusually, has appealed to readers all across the political spectrum.
Gordon Wood’s Radicalism of the American Revolution is a book that extensively covers the origin and ideas preceding the American Revolution. Wood’s account of the Revolution goes beyond the history and timeline of the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and.
Gordon S. Wood, "The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution" I want to talk about the origins of the Constitution. As a historical problem: why do we have the Constitution? Following Professor Gordon Wood's recent lecture at the ISI Summer Institute, one of my new friends and fellow participants, a non-historian, posed an interesting question to me and several other Early American historians then present.
This book by Gordon S.
Wood is a compilation of 8 essays that were previously published in articles, reviews or books by the author. These essays are neatly sandwiched between an introduction and an epilogue which the author uses to tie his central thesis 5/5.Download